If you are willing to shed weight and tone your body, chances are that you are already dieting and working out. Both of these are generally effective and healthy ways to keep your figure in good shape. However, fat in certain areas of the body is often stubborn, and you may find it very hard or impossible to get rid of it. Moreover, the conventional fat-loss methods also require significantly long periods to be effective. In such a case, EmSculpt and CoolSculpting are your best options.
Often, individuals have a busy work schedule that makes it difficult for them to work out enough to build their body the way they wish. Both the sophisticated technologies mentioned above can help one achieve it rather quickly and easily. Let us take a look at how EmSculpt and CoolSculpting differ.
The difference between EmSculpt and CoolSculpting
If you have been planning to opt for one of these advanced treatment processes, you may face a dilemma when it is about making the right choice. After all, both of these appear to perform similar functions, right?
Well, there are several sharp differences between EmSculpt and CoolSculpting. Staying aware of these can help you make the right choice.
The very purpose of the two procedures differs from each other. CoolSculpting aims to get rid of excess fat. It is effective on various parts of the body, such as the upper arms, abs, thighs, back, banana rolls, etc. This is basically a gold-standard treatment for fat reduction without surgery.
EmSculpt, on the other hand, is meant to build up strong muscles and tone the body. In fact, EmSculpt is a non-invasive body contouring procedure that can quickly produce the results of intense workouts. The results of EmSculpt are quite impressive, and it is an effective solution for individuals trying to gain a great body shape quickly.
The two techniques are also based on entirely different technologies. EmSculpt uses High-Intensity Focused Electromagnetic (HIFEM) technology to deliver stunning results. The electromagnetic waves target the muscles and result in intense contractions. These contractions are similar to those caused during a workout, only much more effective. A session of EmSculpt can equal 20000 crunches in terms of muscle tightening.
CoolSculpting uses a technology known as Cryolipolysis. This is a fat-freezing technology that kills fat cells by applying freezing temperatures. The CoolSculpting applicator slightly sucks in the skin and the fatty tissues of the desired areas.
The cups create low temperatures that would not cause any damage to the skin but are cold enough to kill fat cells. As the cold penetrates the skin, the target fat cells die immediately. These fat cells shed automatically over a period of time.
As the two processes have different goals and use different technologies, the results vary too. Neither is exactly a weight loss procedure. However, you may notice a reduction in your weight after undergoing a CoolSculpting procedure due to the loss of fat cells. The technology only kills the target fat cells and then relies on your body to remove them over time. You may not see results for a few weeks.
EmSculpt, however, directly sculpts the body by stimulating the effects of intense exercising. You may notice the results starting to appear after the first session itself. However, it would take four sessions to unlock the full potential of an EmSculpt procedure. You may find your clothes getting tighter as your muscles undergo toning.
Would it be better to choose EmSculpt or CoolSculpting?
It is necessary to understand that comparing EmSculpt and CoolSculpting is basically the same as comparing two entirely different treatment procedures. You would have to make a choice based on your goals. To put it in brief:
- EmSculpt is for toning and shaping the muscles
- CoolSculpting intends to get rid of unwanted fat
Hence, if you feel like your body has developed too much fat that is hard to get rid of, CoolSculpting is the way to go. However, if you wish to get your body sculpted into a muscular shape, you would want to choose EmSculpt.
Should you consider undergoing both procedures?
Now that you know that EmSculpt and CoolSculpting serve two different purposes, it is natural to wonder whether you should opt for both. CoolSculpting does not necessarily require you to undergo EmSculpt sessions. However, once you shed the fat, you might want to opt for EmSculpt to tone your muscles, which means EmSculpt would be optional.
On the other hand, EmSculpt requires you to be free of body fat. Having any excess fat on your body would prevent the procedure from taking effect fully. Doctors usually recommend undergoing CoolSculpting first to kill the fat cells and then opt for EmSculpt.
Is it safe to undergo CoolSculpting and EmSculpt?
Both the treatment procedures are FDA-approved and pain-free. CoolSculpting has a relatively longer track record than EmSculpt, but the latter has proven to be very safe too. As long as an expert practitioner is handling the procedures, the chances of facing any health issues are very low.
However, it is crucial to remember that EmSculpt uses electromagnetic waves. Hence, it is not safe for individuals who have metallic implants in their bodies.
Ultimately, the choice lies in your hands, depending on whether you seek fat reduction or muscle toning. The best way to make the decision would be to consult a professional and discuss your requirements.